In 2020-2021, the United States saw a discernible rise in armed politics and violent activism˳ Multiple factions and movements resorted to violence or the threat of violence to pursue their objectives, and the United States witnessed scenes it had not experienced for decades, such as armed citizens patrolling the streets in Georgia, Kentucky, Minnesota, Wisconsin, and elsewhere˳1 Militant anarchists and anti-fascists often took to the streets during this period˳ On August 29, 2020, Michael Reinoehl became the first anti-fascist responsible for a killing in the United States in 25 years when he shot Aaron Danielson, a member of the far-right group Patriot Prayer, at a rally in Portland, Oregon˳2
In 2020, Antifa became a household word and a contested topic in presidential debates˳ However, it is clearly difficult for many observers to differentiate anti-fascist and anarchist efforts from a broader set of protest activities˳ Militant anarchists and anti-fascists see themselves as responding to an oppressive state and the rise of fascist organizing˳ While militant anti-fascists and anarchists view themselves as the protectors of marginalized communities, other militant actors see anarchist and anti-fascist groups as the aggressors to whom they are responding˳
This report analyzes militant anti-fascism and anarchism within the broader domestic tapestry of armed politics and also explores transnational movements connected to anarchism and anti-fascism˳ Ideologically, anarchism and anti-fascism are similar but not identical˳ Anarchism is resolute in its opposition to the state, whereas anti-fascists focus on opposing institutions, groups, and individuals they perceive as fascist˳ However, the two ideologies influence one another, and the two movements have notable commonalities˳ While neither is inherently violent, both ideologies have adherents who embrace the use of violence to achieve their goals˳ This report examines why and how these groups carry out violence, and how they interact with partners˳
Anti-fascism and anarchism are not new ideologies˳ There is a rich history of global anti-fascist and anarchist organizing˳ Militant anarchists and anti-fascists are active in Europe, Latin America, and beyond, participating in acts of street violence similar to those recently seen in the United States˳ In some countries – particularly in Chile, Greece, Italy, and Mexico – militant anarchists also perpetrate violence outside of protest situations, including arson, bombings, assassinations, and assaults˳ Fortunately, militant anarchist and anti-fascist movements in the United States have conducted such attacks less frequently˳
Experts view militant anarchist and anti-fascist activity as largely decentralized˳ Many of these militant groups exist solely at the local level, in small units called affinity groups˳ Members largely focus on limited violence during protests and other mass actions rather than carrying out targeted attacks˳ Militant anarchist and anti-fascist groups worldwide emphasize indirect communication with one another˳ Public blogs and news sites function as clearinghouses to issue communiqués, claim attacks, and publicize violence˳ Select conflict regions – particularly Rojava in Syria and the Donbas region in Ukraine – and major protests present opportunities for in-person exchanges˳
Though militant anti-fascists and anarchists engage in violent activity, both movements embrace some elements of pacifism or nonviolence˳ Militant anarchists, for example, typically prefer attacking property and infrastructure over people˳ For attacks employing bombs, for example, they often strike at times when fewer people are expected to be at the attack location˳ However, anarchist groups in Latin America and Europe have intentionally engaged in lethal violence˳
In the United States, the First Amendment protects advocacy of anarchist or anti-fascist goals and ideologies decoupled from the use of violence˳ Individual members of a single group may vary in their willingness to deploy violence to achieve shared goals˳ Groups and individuals who engage in violent activity may mingle with those who do not but espouse similar rhetoric or beliefs˳
There may be a shift in militant anarchist and anti-fascist activities under the Biden administration˳ The activity of these groups tends to be cyclical, dependent upon the degree to which “fascists” are thought to be gaining power˳ These groups saw former President Donald Trump as fitting into this category˳ As a result, under his administration, the United States saw a significant increase in activity by anarchist and anti-fascist groups, reaching heights not seen in decades˳ Now that the apparent peak of civil unrest has passed and Trump has left office, militant anarchist and anti-fascist activities may decline˳ That said, militant anarchists and anti-fascists are motivated by a wide range of goals, many of which are unlikely to change under the new administration˳ Numerous groups that fall under this umbrella vociferously disagree with many of the Biden administration’s policies, which they believe do not go far enough to the left˳ Regardless, if militant anarchist and anti-fascist groups try to maintain a similar operational tempo under the Biden administration, they may attract less support˳ The biggest countervailing factor that may enable continued large-scale mobilizations is the information environment, which makes such mobilizations easier than ever before˳
