A recent controversy has arisen on National Highway 27, passing through Lạc Lâm Commune, Đơn Dương District, Lâm Đồng Province, regarding the placement of 23 no-parking signs along a 1km stretch of road. Many argue that this excessive signage is wasteful and poorly planned.
Dense Signage Creates Traffic Frustration
The area is residential, with a grid-like street pattern. A no-parking sign is located at every intersection of National Highway 27 and the smaller streets. This has created significant inconvenience for residents and commuters, making navigation difficult, especially for vehicles.
Local Government’s Explanation
Mr. Nguyễn Văn Tứ, head of the Economic and Infrastructure Department in Đơn Dương District, stated that the signs were installed after consultation with various government agencies and in compliance with regulations. The purpose, he explained, was to foster a civilized urban environment and ensure adherence to regulations. However, he did not provide specific cost details, merely stating it was part of an urban infrastructure project.
Public and Reader Feedback
Many readers of Dân trí newspaper expressed their opinions on the issue. One reader, Phan Trọng, argued that the excessive signage was wasteful in terms of materials and construction costs. Other comments highlighted a lack of planning and expertise in the installation of the signs.
Lâm Đồng Province’s Transportation Department Perspective
Mr. Nguyễn Văn Gia, Director of the Lâm Đồng Province Department of Transportation, acknowledged that the signage was not inherently unlawful but was not optimally implemented. He suggested that instead of multiple signs at intersections, a single sign at the beginning of the no-parking zone, with an indication of the road’s length, would be more efficient and avoid inconveniencing residents.
Conclusion
The case of 23 no-parking signs on a single kilometer highlights the need for more effective and scientific sign design and placement. While legal compliance is crucial, practicality and minimizing inconvenience for citizens should be equally important considerations. Government agencies should prioritize public feedback and adopt the most efficient solutions to foster a safe, convenient, and civilized traffic environment.
