The Hanoi People’s Committee is seeking public opinion to finalize a draft resolution on traffic fines for road violations. The proposed fines would be increased by 1.5 to 2 times compared to current regulations, with some offenses carrying penalties of up to 120 million VND.
Reasons Behind the Fine Increase Proposal
According to the Capital Law 2024, the Hanoi People’s Council is permitted to set higher fines, not exceeding twice the national average. Mr. Le Trung Hieu, Deputy Director of Hanoi’s Department of Planning and Investment, believes that increasing fines is necessary to build citizens’ compliance with traffic laws.
Traffic police checking violators
Traffic police in Hanoi inspecting and handling violations (Photo: Manh Quan).
Mr. Hieu emphasized that the primary goal of increasing fines is not to generate revenue but to maintain traffic order and safety. “Heavier fines will help eliminate the ‘carefree’ attitude towards laws, improving traffic awareness and culture,” he said.
Practical evidence shows that when fines were increased, such as imposing several million VND for running red lights or driving against traffic, many people began changing their habits. This demonstrates the effectiveness of deterrent measures in enhancing community awareness.
Expert Opinions on Implementing Higher Fines
Mr. Nguyen Van Thanh, former Chairman of the Vietnam Automobile Transportation Association, expressed support for the proposal. However, he advised careful consideration before implementation. “We should focus on dangerous behaviors like overloading, speeding, or driving under the influence, rather than fining indiscriminately,” Mr. Thanh recommended.
He also suggested that particularly serious offenses should be handled criminally rather than just through administrative fines. This would enhance deterrence and protect community safety.
Solutions for Effective Enforcement
To prevent negative outcomes during enforcement, Mr. Hieu stressed the importance of technological supervision. Using cameras and image-based remote enforcement systems will reduce errors and ensure transparency.
Additionally, authorities should focus on preventing violations rather than just addressing consequences. Issues such as obscured traffic signs and poorly designed road layouts need timely rectification. Moreover, fines should be applied openly and transparently to avoid misunderstandings or negative perceptions.
Another suggestion is to reinvest the fine revenues into transportation infrastructure. This includes maintaining roads, repairing traffic signals, and subsidizing public transport—factors that contribute to reducing congestion and traffic violations.
Conclusion
Hanoi’s proposal to increase traffic violation fines is a step in the right direction to improve citizen awareness and ensure traffic safety. However, for maximum effectiveness, careful selection of offenses subject to fines is essential, along with enhanced monitoring and transparency in enforcement. Let’s work together to build a more civilized and safer traffic environment!
Source: Dan Tri
