The reorganization of county civil enforcement systems across the country is being strongly promoted by the State Administration of Civil Execution (Ministry of Justice). This is a crucial step to enhance operational effectiveness and meet practical needs.
Organizational Reform
Mr. Nguyễn Quang Thái, Director General of the State Administration of Civil Execution, has recently issued directives to local provincial execution offices regarding the restructuring and organization of civil enforcement systems in line with the Ministry of Justice’s guidelines.
A key aspect of this plan involves transforming district-level civil enforcement agencies into county-level or multi-county regional enforcement agencies. Mr. Thái emphasized: “Proposed names for regional enforcement agencies should reflect the names of counties within their respective areas.”
Restructuring Civil Enforcement Agencies
The State Administration of Civil Execution plans to reorganize into the Bureau of Civil Execution Management.
Optimizing Operations
The administration encourages the consolidation of district enforcement agencies with lower-than-average caseloads, while also considering natural conditions, socio-economic factors, and historical context when establishing multi-county regional agencies. This approach aims to alleviate workload and improve management and execution efficiency.
Proposals and reports on the restructuring and organization of district-level civil enforcement agencies will comply with Government Decree No. 158/2018, which regulates the establishment, reorganization, and dissolution of administrative bodies.
Central Guidance
Previously, central plans proposed restructuring the State Administration of Civil Execution into the Bureau of Civil Execution Management. Additionally, the 63 provincial civil enforcement bureaus would be reorganized into provincial-level enforcement agencies (equivalent to district-level agencies) under the Bureau of Civil Execution Management.
For the current 694 district-level civil enforcement agencies, the plan is to restructure them into 427 county-level or multi-county regional enforcement teams.
Conclusion
The restructuring of county-level civil enforcement systems not only optimizes resource allocation but also enhances service quality for citizens. Readers interested in more detailed information can refer to official channels of the Ministry of Justice.
Reference: Original article from Dan Tri newspaper.
